Every figure in the planner comes from the sources below. We read patient guidance from medical societies and public bodies and abstracts of published studies. Clinic and manufacturer pages are not used as evidence. “Read” shows how much of each source we could read: a full page, an abstract only, or a failed attempt. Values were taken only from sources that were read.
Botulinum toxin (Botox-type) injections
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- AAD: Botulinum toxin FAQs (public patient page)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; read via summarising fetch tool, not raw HTML. Sections: Is there downtime? / What must I do after the procedure? / What are the possible side effects? / Warnings. - PubMed (J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2020;13(12):E56-E83, Nestor et al.): Onset and Duration of AbobotulinumtoxinA for Aesthetic Use in the Upper Face: A Systematic Literature Review
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; Single product (abobotulinumtoxinA); sponsored by Ipsen with author industry ties. - NHS (Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals): Botox patient leaflet WPR47810
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Re-read 2026-11-02 by extracting PDF text locally (pdftotext). Leaflet is a general Botox information sheet (frown lines/wrinkles, face, neck, jaw clenching, sweating), dated Dec 2020, review date Dec 2022. Sections: How soon will I see the effects / Are there any side effects / Aftercare Advice. - Mayo Clinic: Botox (about)
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; HTTP 403; no values taken. - NHS Lothian: Botox post treatment care (Information for patients, V1.0)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; One-page NHS leaflet, approved May 2021, review date May 2024. The leaflet does not say whether the Botox is cosmetic or medical (contact line is a neurosciences nurse practitioner team), so treat as general NHS aftercare.
What these sources do not say: No source found for: heat/sauna/hot tub/steam room after botulinum toxin (none of AAD, NHS Doncaster, NHS Lothian, the review mention it).; No source found for: sun exposure, tanning or swimming after botulinum toxin.; Flying: only NHS Lothian (24 hours, long-haul); AAD and NHS Doncaster do not mention it. Single, one-page leaflet.; Alcohol: only NHS Lothian (6 hours); AAD and NHS Doncaster do not mention it.; Facial/massage: AAD and Doncaster say no rubbing or massaging with no end date; Lothian gives 24 hours only for facial treatment.; AAD gives no duration for swelling or redness and no onset time.; Mayo Clinic Botox page could not be read (HTTP 403); ASPS, Aesthetic Society, ASDS botulinum pages and the FDA Botox Cosmetic label were not obtained.; Onset/duration review data is for abobotulinumtoxinA only; the NHS Lothian leaflet does not say whether the use is cosmetic.; Exercise windows differ across sources (2 hours, up to 6 hours, 24 hours); not merged.
Hyaluronic acid dermal fillers (face)
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- AAD: Fillers: FAQs (public patient page)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page covering all filler types; values here are the HA-specific or general ones. Sections: Is there downtime? / What must I do after getting a filler? / How long will the results last? / What are the possible side effects? - FDA: Dermal Fillers (Soft Tissue Fillers)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US government page; read via summarising fetch tool. Sections: Risks / When to seek care / Talk to your provider. - PMC (systematic review and meta-analysis): Adverse Events Reported From Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Injections to the Facial Region
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; Only a search-result snippet seen (events mostly mild, self-limiting); no values taken. - NHS / ASDS: NHS botox and fillers page; ASDS dermal fillers page
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; NHS URL 404; ASDS page had no relevant content. - FDA (manufacturer patient labeling, FDA-approved): About JUVEDERM Ultra XC for Lip Augmentation (patient labeling; file metadata title 'Juvederm Ultra with Lidocaine Patient Labeling')
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Official approved label on FDA site, read by local PDF text extraction (first pages: Precautions, Risks). Lip-specific product (adults over 21). Sections: 4 Precautions / 7 Risks. - Manufacturer patient labeling (FDA-approved label, AbbVie): About JUVEDERM VOLLURE XC (patient labeling)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Approved patient labeling for nasolabial folds (face), adults over 21; hosted on the manufacturer's prescribing-information site, used as an official label, not promotional copy. Sections: 4 Precautions / 7 Risks / 10 After Procedure Information.
What these sources do not say: No source found for: flying after HA filler (AAD, FDA page and both labels do not mention it; the NHS filler page could not be read).; No source found for: swimming, saunas/hot tubs/steam rooms by name, or facials/massage after HA filler beyond AAD's 3-day touching rule.; Alcohol: only the Vollure XC label (24 hours); AAD, FDA and the Ultra XC lip label do not mention it.; Heat: labels say 'extensive sun or heat' for 24 hours; AAD and FDA are silent.; Makeup: AAD says OK before leaving the office; Vollure label says ask your doctor. Not merged.; Swelling/bruising durations: AAD 7 to 14 days (all filler types), lip label mostly 14 days or less, nasolabial-fold label mostly within 1 week; FDA 'a few days to weeks'. No separate bruising vs swelling duration.; Labels cover only two Juvederm products (lip, nasolabial folds); other HA brands and areas (tear trough, cheeks, jawline) were not read.; NHS, ASDS, Aesthetic Society, ASPS patient pages not obtained.
Skin boosters (injected hyaluronic acid or polynucleotide skin-quality injectables)
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- Archives of Plastic Surgery (PMC11560330): Injectable 'Skin Boosters' in Aging Skin Rejuvenation: A Current Overview (2024)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Narrative review, not a systematic review; first ~100k of ~152k characters read; much evidence from Korean studies. - Int J Mol Sci (PMC11311621): Polynucleotides in Aesthetic Medicine: A Review of Current Practices and Perceived Effectiveness (2024)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Narrative review with OCEBM grading; first ~100k of ~148k characters read; reference list includes two retracted studies. - Dermatology Research (DOI 10.1002/der2.70080): Nucleotide-Based Skin Boosters in Aesthetic Dermatology: A Scoping Review of Their Potential Role
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; Read via an abstract aggregator page; journal name and year not shown there (journal name inferred from the DOI prefix only, not confirmed). 6 studies. - ASDS: Injectable Hyaluronic Acid
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; About HA dermal filler in general. Does not mention skin boosters or microinjections; used only for general HA risks and who should avoid. - FDA (approved patient labeling, manufacturer document): SKINVIVE by JUVEDERM Patient Information Labeling (08/2022)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Official FDA-posted patient labeling for one intradermal HA product (cheeks, adults over 21), not a society guide and not polynucleotide. Text extracted locally from the 9-page PDF. Percentages are of 199 participants; duration = first to last day the symptom was recorded in a 30-day diary. - ASPS (American Society of Plastic Surgeons): Dermal Fillers Recovery
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Dermal fillers in general, not skin boosters; US patient page. - ASPS (American Society of Plastic Surgeons): What not to do after getting facial filler
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; ASPS news article quoting individual surgeons (listed advice attributed to Anureet Bajaj, MD); filler in general, not skin boosters. - FDA: Dermal Fillers (Soft Tissue Fillers) consumer page
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; General dermal filler consumer page; says nothing about exercise, alcohol, heat, sun or flying. - NHS: Face and lip fillers (dermal fillers) - nhs.uk
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; Fetch returned only the cosmetic-procedures index page, not the filler page. A search summary attributed alcohol/coffee/sun advice to it, but this was not verified, so no value is used. - Mayo Clinic: Facial fillers for wrinkles
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; HTTP 403; no value taken.
What these sources do not say: No AAD, ASDS, NHS or Mayo page on skin boosters was found; the ASDS HA page does not mention them.; The 2024 Skin Res Technol review 'Skin boosters: Definitions and varied classifications' (PMID 38481069) is retracted and was not used for any value.; Evidence is mostly narrative reviews, small studies and a 6-study scoping review; the authors call for larger controlled trials.; The scoping review was read as an abstract only through an aggregator, with no journal or year shown.; What sources say: exercise 24-48 h, heat/sauna 24-48 h, alcohol 24-48 h, sun 24 h (FDA SKINVIVE label and ASPS filler pages, both filler/HA product-specific, not polynucleotide boosters).; No source found for: swimming, tanning, or any specific day count for makeup (FDA SKINVIVE label only says ask the doctor).; No source found for flying with a number; ASPS only names high-altitude flying as a possible swelling trigger.; No source found that covers polynucleotide boosters' activity restrictions or downtime; all activity values come from HA filler or one HA skin-smoothness product.; The SKINVIVE label is a single manufacturer product injected into the cheeks of adults over 21; it is an FDA-posted official document but it describes one product, and duration percentages are of all 199 participants, not of those with the symptom.; Sources differ: ASPS says 24-48 hours of caution; the FDA label says first 24 hours; one ASPS article lists exercise at 24 hours but heat at 24-48 hours.; NHS dermal filler page and Mayo Clinic filler page could not be read (index page only / 403).
Low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG laser toning and picosecond laser (pigment / skin tone)
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- PubMed Central (Medicina): The Low-Fluence Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Melasma: A Systematic Review (Lee et al., 2022)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Read first ~100,000 of ~135,000 characters. Melasma-focused; mostly observational studies. - PubMed (Lasers Med Sci): Efficacy and safety of picosecond laser for the treatment of melasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis (Feng et al., 2023)
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; 6 RCTs; melasma only; high heterogeneity. 1064 nm: no significant side effects reported; 755 nm: post-inflammatory darkening reported. - AAD: Melasma: Diagnosis and treatment
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; laser mentioned only briefly as an add-on. - AAD: Skin conditions that lasers can treat
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; General laser page, not specific to toning or picosecond. - NHS (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust): Laser Treatment (patient information, 2nd edition, reviewed 01/07/2025)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Trust leaflet covering vascular, pigment and ablative lasers in general (not low-fluence toning or picosecond specifically). Section: After treatment. - NHS (St Helens and Knowsley / Mersey and West Lancashire): Laser aftercare leaflet (PDF)
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; Fetch returned compressed binary; no values taken.
What these sources do not say: No society page read that describes laser toning or picosecond recovery specifically.; No exercise, heat/sauna, alcohol, makeup, massage or flying guidance found.; Picosecond abstract gives no downtime, session count or interval numbers.; Bruising duration given only as 'a few days', not as numbers.; NHS had no relevant page; Mayo Clinic pages returned access errors.; no source found for alcohol after laser toning or picosecond.; no source found for flying after laser toning or picosecond.; no toning- or picosecond-specific source for exercise, sauna, swimming or makeup; the 7-day and 48-hour figures come from a general NHS trust laser leaflet.; Crusting duration not stated (Leeds leaflet only says leave scabs/blisters intact).; Merseyside/West Lancashire NHS leaflet PDFs could not be read (compressed PDF), so their different swimming/exercise windows are not used.
Fractional laser resurfacing (ablative CO2/Er:YAG and non-ablative)
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- ASDS: Laser Resurfacing
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; only the healing-time and daily-care sentences were confirmed on a repeat fetch. A first fetch also returned antiviral, candidacy and risk items that the repeat fetch did not show; treat those with care. - ASDS: Non-ablative Laser Resurfacing for Wrinkles
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page. - ASDS: Non-ablative Laser Rejuvenation
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page. - AAD: Acne scars: How to care for your skin after treatment
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; About acne scar treatments in general, not specifically fractional laser. - AAD: 10 things to know before having laser treatment for your scar
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Scar-focused; describes non-ablative only. - PubMed (J Cosmet Dermatol): CO2 fractional laser versus Er:YAG fractional laser in atrophic acne scar: meta-analysis (Liu et al., 2024)
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; Acne scars only; relative differences between lasers, not absolute recovery times. - Mayo Clinic: Laser resurfacing
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; HTTP 403; no values taken. - PubMed Central: Sequential IPL and non-ablative fractionated laser, Fitzpatrick II-IV (PMC6585794)
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; Blocked by reCAPTCHA; no values taken. - PubMed Central: Laser Resurfacing Pearls (PMC3580978)
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; Blocked by reCAPTCHA; no values taken. - ASDS: Laser Resurfacing for Sun-damaged
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; ablative resurfacing wording. - ASDS: Laser Resurfacing for Acne Scars
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; ablative resurfacing wording. - NHS (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust): Laser Treatment (patient information, 2nd edition, reviewed 01/07/2025)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Covers vascular, pigment and ablative lasers incl. focal and fractional Er:YAG; figures are general, not split by laser type. - NHS (Birmingham Regional Skin Laser Centre, Sandwell and West Birmingham): Laser Resurfacing (patient leaflet, dated 2013)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; CO2 resurfacing for scars, birthmarks, sun damage; not described as fractional; leaflet is from 2013. Text extracted from PDF with a local tool. - ASPS: Laser Skin Resurfacing Recovery
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; mentions CO2 and erbium lasers only. - ASPS: Laser Skin Resurfacing Results
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Only the Results text was returned. - ASPS: Last-minute glow-up: What procedures are safe before travel?
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Surgeon interviews, concerns timing BEFORE a trip; no flying-after rule for laser. - NHS (St Helens and Knowsley / Mersey and West Lancashire): Laser aftercare leaflet (PDF)
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; Fetch returned compressed binary; no values taken.
What these sources do not say: Ablative and non-ablative are in one file; the ablative 3 to 10 day figure comes from one ASDS sentence that does not separate fractional from fully ablative.; No redness duration, scab/crust, peeling duration, exercise, heat/sauna, alcohol, massage or flying guidance read.; No warning-sign list in the sources read.; Mayo Clinic and two PMC articles could not be read (access blocks).; The 6 to 8 week sun figure comes from an acne-scar aftercare page, not a fractional-specific page.; NHS has no relevant page.; no source found for alcohol after fractional or other laser resurfacing.; no source found for flying after laser resurfacing: the ASPS travel article gives no after-laser rule; one surgeon suggests bigger skin procedures including laser be done about a month or more before a trip (timing before travel, not a flying-after limit).; no source found for facial or massage after laser resurfacing beyond the cleaning/exfoliation advice above.; Exercise, sauna and swimming figures (7 days) come from one general NHS trust leaflet that mixes laser types; Birmingham's CO2 leaflet says only 'until fully healed' for swimming and sauna.; ASDS healing time differs between its pages: 3 to 10 days (main resurfacing page) vs 10 to 21 days (sun-damaged and acne-scar pages).; ASPS travel and Merseyside leaflets: Merseyside PDF unreadable; its different windows are not used.; Non-ablative fractional: only ASDS statements (return to work immediately, makeup over redness, avoid sun, SPF 30+); no source gives exercise, sauna, swimming or flying timing specifically for non-ablative.
Microfocused / high-intensity focused ultrasound skin lifting (Ultherapy-type)
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- ASDS: Ultrasound Therapy for Sagging Skin
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page. Does not state downtime, activity restrictions or contraindications. Text via page-summarizing fetch tool. - ASDS: Non-invasive Skin Tightening Treatments
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; general for laser/RF/ultrasound energy devices, not device-specific (downtime, bruising and redness durations are generic). Text via page-summarizing fetch tool. - AAD: Many ways to firm sagging skin
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; covers ultrasound and radiofrequency generically without brand names. Text obtained through a page-summarizing fetch tool. - Dermatologic Surgery (PubMed 39625163): Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization: A Systematic Review of Adverse Events and Risk of Subsequent Facelift Compromise
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; 19 articles / 506 patients plus 106 MAUDE records. Abstract gives no rates or durations. - Aesthetic Surgery Journal: Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization (MFU-V) Effectiveness and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; 2024 (vol 45); durations of adverse events not reported; Discussion says no serious adverse events observed. - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open (PMC7288869): Use of Micro-focused Ultrasound for Skin Tightening of Mid and Lower Face
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; 2019 prospective double-blind study, 50 adults; patients were given these instructions as a study protocol, not a patient leaflet. Heat, sun, makeup, alcohol, flying not mentioned. - Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology (PMC8211327): Customized Treatment Using Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization for Optimized Patient Outcomes (narrative review, Pan-Asian consensus adaptation)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; 2021 narrative review, non-systematic; last ~16,900 characters not read. No activity restrictions. - The Aesthetic Society: Skin Tightening Procedure Overview
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Read; contains no recovery, downtime, activity or side-effect durations. Only says multiple treatments may be needed. - FDA 510(k) database (Ulthera, K180623 / K243035): Ulthera System clearance letters
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; Only seen as search results with garbled OCR; no precautions or aftercare text obtained, no values taken.
What these sources do not say: No source read gives numeric day counts for swelling after ultrasound specifically (ASDS says 'a few days'); the 1-2 week figure is from a general energy-device page.; No guidance on exercise, sauna/heat, alcohol, sun, massage or flying.; No treatment interval stated.; The review and meta-analysis do not report adverse-event durations.; No Ultherapy-brand-specific society page was read; sources are US-based.; Activity answers: exercise = one study protocol (3-5 days, no exercise and no icing); no source found for sauna/hot tub/steam room, alcohol, flying, massage/facial, sun exposure/tanning, swimming, or makeup beyond AAD's 'often immediately'.; Swelling duration differs by source: ASDS 'a few days'; ASDS general page up to 1-2 weeks; 50-adult study 2 to 14 days.; Aesthetic Society page was read and has no recovery content. Ulthera FDA clearance PDFs could not be read.
Monopolar radiofrequency skin tightening (Thermage-type)
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- AAD: Many ways to firm sagging skin
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; covers ultrasound and radiofrequency generically without brand names. Text obtained through a page-summarizing fetch tool. - ASDS: Non-invasive Skin Tightening Treatments
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; general for laser/RF/ultrasound energy devices, not device-specific (downtime, bruising and redness durations are generic). Text via page-summarizing fetch tool. - J Drugs Dermatol (PubMed 16989184): Monopolar radiofrequency facial tightening: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety in over 600 treatments
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; 2006 retrospective series on an older-generation device; may not reflect current protocols. - The Aesthetic Society: Skin Tightening Procedure Overview
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Read; contains no recovery, downtime, activity or side-effect durations. Only says a series of RF treatments may be performed. - J Am Acad Dermatol (PubMed 21315951): Radiofrequency facial rejuvenation: evidence-based effect
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; 2011 review abstract; says RF has 'fewer side effects and downtime' for photoaging; no activity guidance or durations. - PMC (The Use of Radiofrequency in Aesthetic Surgery, PMC7489578): The Use of Radiofrequency in Aesthetic Surgery
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; Page returned a browser verification check; no values taken.
What these sources do not say: No source read gives exercise, sauna/heat, alcohol, sun, massage or flying guidance.; No treatment interval stated.; Swelling duration differs: ASDS generic page says up to 1-2 weeks; the 2006 series says usually under 24 hours, up to 1 week for a few patients.; AAD page does not name brands; the only peer-reviewed data read is one older single series.; DermNet NZ and clinic pages were seen only as search snippets and are not used.; Activity answers: only makeup (AAD, 'often immediately') is sourced. No source found for exercise, sauna/hot tub/steam room, alcohol, flying, massage/facial, sun exposure/tanning, or swimming after monopolar RF tightening.; Aesthetic Society page was read and has no recovery content; PMC7489578 could not be read.
Radiofrequency microneedling
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- AAD: Microneedling can fade scars, uneven skin tone, and more
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Mainly plain microneedling; RF mentioned briefly. Downtime/aftercare numbers are not RF-specific. Text via page-summarizing fetch tool. - ASDS: Microneedling
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Plain microneedling; does not mention radiofrequency. - Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology: Radiofrequency Microneedling for Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; 2026; adverse events mild and transient; no numeric downtime reported. - NHS (Chelsea and Westminster Hospital): Microneedling Post-treatment Information for patients
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Hospital leaflet for scar microneedling, not RF; the last ~9,650 characters were not read. Used only as a general microneedling reference. - Dermatologic Surgery (PubMed 33577211): Radiofrequency Microneedling: A Comprehensive and Critical Review
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; Abstract has no downtime or adverse-event numbers; full text paywalled and not read. - FDA: Microneedling Devices: Getting to the Point on Benefits, Risks and Safety
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; FDA consumer update (current as of 10/15/2025); general microneedling, says RF devices carry different risks. No activity guidance beyond sun/product sensitivity. - FDA: Potential Risks with Certain Uses of Radiofrequency (RF) Microneedling: FDA Safety Communication
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Dated 2025-10-15. Lists complications; gives no recovery durations or activity advice.
What these sources do not say: No society page read is specific to RF microneedling aftercare; AAD/ASDS/NHS numbers come from plain microneedling.; RFMN systematic review gives no numeric downtime (only 'minimal downtime' and 'within 48 h').; No guidance on alcohol, massage/pressure or flying.; Sources differ: AAD says downtime minimal, ASDS says 2-7 days, NHS leaflet says redness improves in 1-2 days.; Activity answers: exercise, heat/sauna, swimming and sun come only from an NHS scar-microneedling leaflet (72 hours / 7 days) and AAD/FDA general microneedling pages; none is RF-specific. No source found for alcohol, flying, massage/facial pressure, or tanning after RF microneedling.; FDA pages give no recovery durations or exercise advice; the FDA 2025 communication names burns, scarring, fat loss, disfigurement and nerve damage as reported complications.
Microneedling (collagen induction, without radiofrequency)
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- AAD: Microneedling can fade scars, uneven skin tone, and more
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; read via page-text extraction. - ASDS: Microneedling
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; page appears undated. - NHS (Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust): Microneedling Post-treatment Information for patients
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Single NHS trust leaflet written for scar treatment (burns/scar service), not cosmetic facial rejuvenation; last ~10k characters of page not read. - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (PubMed 40542236): Microneedling for Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review (2025)
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; 21 articles, 723 patients; abstract does not give event durations. - J Clin Aesthet Dermatol (PMC7869810): A Systematic Review Examining the Potential Adverse Effects of Microneedling (2021)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; 51 articles, 1,029 patients; includes roller, stamp, pen and RF devices. - NHS (Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust): Patient information: Micro-needling for treatment of scars and burns and removal of radiotherapy marker tattoos (WAHT-PI-1155, v1, 2023)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Hospital leaflet for medical micro-needling of scars/burns, a tattoo-style technique, not cosmetic facial microneedling; review date on the leaflet (Jan 2026) has passed. Text extracted locally from the PDF. - AAD: Microneedling: experienced hands can improve the face (news page)
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; Fetch returned only the AAD news-release index with an empty template, no article text; no value taken.
What these sources do not say: No source read gives guidance on alcohol, massage/facial pressure, or flying.; AAD and ASDS give no exercise or sauna guidance; the only numbers (72 hours) come from an NHS trust scar leaflet that may not apply to cosmetic treatment.; AAD gives no lower bound for redness duration ('a few days to a week').; Systematic reviews mix roller, pen, stamp and RF devices; durations may not match a given clinic's device.; Only the abstract of the 2025 facial rejuvenation review was read; it gives no event durations.; What sources say: exercise 24 h to 72 h (varies by source), sauna/swimming/hot water 72 h to 1 week, sun avoidance 7 days (NHS) or sunscreen after 24 h (ASDS), makeup 24 h to 72 h; numbers beyond AAD/ASDS come from NHS scar/burn leaflets.; No source found for: alcohol, flying, tanning after treatment, facial massage or facials after cosmetic microneedling, or a specific number of days for peeling.; AAD news page on microneedling could not be read (index page only).; Worcestershire leaflet covers scars/burns and was due for review in January 2026; its use for cosmetic facial treatment is not established.
Chemical peel (superficial and medium-depth; deep peel noted briefly)
Evidence tier: mixed. Last checked: 2026-11-02
- AAD: Chemical peels: FAQs
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; a search snippet suggested the cached copy may be older, check live page. - ASDS: Chemical Peels
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; no guidance on who should avoid peels or on session spacing. - J Cutan Aesthet Surg (PMC3560165; PMID 23378707): Complications of Medium Depth and Deep Chemical Peels (Nikalji et al., 2012)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Narrative review of complications; focuses on TCA/phenol medium and deep peels. - JAAD (PubMed 30550830): Basic chemical peeling: Superficial and medium-depth peels (Lee et al., 2019)
read: abstract only; checked 2026-11-02; Abstract only; gives no healing times. - Mayo Clinic: Chemical peel
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; HTTP 403 on fetch; no value taken from it. - NHS: Chemical peels (nhs.uk)
read: failed to read; checked 2026-11-02; HTTP 404 on fetch; no value taken from it. - ASPS (American Society of Plastic Surgeons): Chemical Peel overview and Light Chemical Peel page
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Page text had risks/candidates but not its recovery section; used only for light-peel risks and sunscreen. The /recovery and overview pages returned only summaries and links. - ASPS (American Society of Plastic Surgeons): Medium Chemical Peel page (recovery)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; US patient page; page covers recovery but not swelling, makeup, exercise, return to work or who should avoid. - Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology (PMC3875240): Glycolic acid peel therapy - a current review (Sharad, 2013)
read: full page; checked 2026-11-02; Single-author review of glycolic acid (superficial) peels; not a society guideline; practice is described for Fitzpatrick types I-IV.
What these sources do not say: Mayo Clinic and NHS pages could not be read (403 / 404), so no values come from them.; No source states a day count for returning to work after a superficial or medium peel.; No exercise, sauna, alcohol, massage or flying guidance was found in the pages read.; Review (PMC3560165) covers medium/deep peels only; superficial-peel erythema/edema day counts from other reviews were seen only in a search summary and are not used.; AAD and ASDS give no 'who should avoid' list; those items come from a 2012 review and the ASDS risk section.; AAD page may be an older cached copy.; What sources say: sun avoidance (until healed for medium; several months per ASPS; 3-6 months for deep), makeup timing by depth, no tanning beds (AAD), avoid steam/sauna (one glycolic review), avoid scratching or picking.; No source found for: exercise, alcohol, flying, swimming, or any day count for returning to work after a superficial or medium peel.; NHS chemical peel page was not readable (404 on one URL, index page only on the other); ASPS recovery and overview pages returned only summaries.; Sources differ: AAD gives light-peel healing as 1-7 days in one table and about 1 day in the results section; medium-peel redness 'longer than a few months' (ASPS) vs about 15-30 days (2012 review); peeling about a week (ASPS) vs 7-14 days (AAD/ASDS).